| From: | "Warren Turkal" <turkal(at)google(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: timestamp datatype cleanup |
| Date: | 2008-03-21 16:44:19 |
| Message-ID: | 8c3d85470803210944v2c969d95i4dbb266b58b5f231@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Warren Turkal" <turkal(at)google(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I have to say, I am wondering more and more how real the need is for
> > the two representations of timestamps. Would it be better to deprecate
> > the float format or at least make the int64 format the default?
>
> This was gone over in great detail just recently ... didn't you see
> that thread?
I actually hadnn't seen the resolution until just now. Thanks for
pointing it out.
wt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-21 16:53:44 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-21 15:53:01 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |