Re: SQL/JSON revisited

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON revisited
Date: 2023-04-04 19:44:05
Message-ID: 8c1aa6af-2c3a-fc95-c441-86d6e9da5fc1@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/4/23 3:40 PM, Nikita Malakhov wrote:
> Hi hackers!
>
> The latest SQL standard contains dot notation for JSON. Are there any
> plans to include it into Pg 16?
> Or maybe we should start a separate thread for it?

I would recommend starting a new thread to discuss the dot notation.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brar Piening 2023-04-04 19:52:31 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page
Previous Message Nikita Malakhov 2023-04-04 19:40:16 Re: SQL/JSON revisited