Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: navbarry(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)
Date: 2024-01-10 17:08:37
Message-ID: 8c1949845213fc807d40b0c1fbbbbca7eab3bdde.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 13:41 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> It still reads a bit weird to me. How about the attached wording instead?

Thanks! I am fine with your wording.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-01-10 19:51:10 Re: initdb username doc bug
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2024-01-10 17:05:17 Re: initdb username doc bug

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-01-10 17:26:36 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2024-01-10 17:04:32 Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist