Re: Virtual generated columns

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Virtual generated columns
Date: 2025-02-07 12:34:47
Message-ID: 8be3512a-a23f-4088-a9ec-bf68650a2997@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06.02.25 00:25, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 22:36, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, this is quite contorted. I have renamed it like you suggested.
>
> I looked over this again and I think the patch is in good shape to be committed.

I've committed it. Thanks.

> One thought that occurred to me was whether it would be better for the
> psql describe output (and maybe also pg_dump) to explicitly output
> "virtual" for columns of this kind. I know that that's the default for
> generated columns, but someone reading the output might not know or
> remember that, so perhaps it would be helpful to be explicit.

My preference was to have the default output format use only
SQL-standard syntax, not extensions like "VIRTUAL". If people hate
this, we can easily change it.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-02-07 12:36:28 Re: Virtual generated columns
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-02-07 11:39:09 Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock