From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sia kc <siavosh(dot)kasravi(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A starter task |
Date: | 2024-09-16 00:00:12 |
Message-ID: | 8b76a228-35e4-49aa-b368-342d7f4d1efe@vondra.me |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/16/24 00:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> sia kc <siavosh(dot)kasravi(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> About reply to all button, I think only sending to mailing list address
>> should suffice. Why including previous recipients too?
>
> It's a longstanding habit around here for a couple of reasons:
>
> * The mail list servers are occasionally slow. (Our infrastructure
> is way better than it once was, but that still happens sometimes.)
> If you directly cc: somebody, they can reply to that copy right away
> whether or not they get a copy from the list right away.
>
> * pgsql-hackers is a fire hose. cc'ing people who have shown interest
> in the thread is useful because they will get those copies separately
> from the list traffic, and so they can follow the thread without
> having to dig through all the traffic.
>
True, but it's also up to the client - the messages sent through the
mailing list have the appropriate headers (List-Id etc.) and it's up to
the client to show the "reply to list" button. Thunderbird does, for
example. I thought gmail would too, but perhaps it doesn't.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul A Jungwirth | 2024-09-16 02:12:34 | Re: SQL:2011 application time |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-09-15 22:32:27 | Re: A starter task |