From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |
Date: | 2020-03-17 21:22:44 |
Message-ID: | 8b67057b658638936abc125382398c143da4397c.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 16:07 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Assume a scale factor >= 1, for example 2, and n live tuples.
> > The table has just been vacuumed.
> >
> > Now we insert m number tuples (which are live).
> >
> > Then the condition
> >
> > threshold + scale_factor * live_tuples < newly_inserted_tuples
> >
> > becomes
> >
> > 10000000 + 2 * (n + m) < m
> >
> > which can never be true for non-negative n and m.
> >
> > So a scale factor >= 1 disables the feature.
>
> No, this is what we mailed about privately yesterday, and I demonstrated that
> autovac can still run with factor=100. I said:
I remember.
Can you point out where exactly the flaw in my reasoning is?
> > It's a multiplier, not a percent out of 100 (fraction is not a great choice of
> > words).
> >
> > &autovacuum_vac_scale,
> > 0.2, 0.0, 100.0,
> >
> > The default is 0.2 (20%), so 100 means after updating/deleting 100*reltuples.
Yes, exactly.
> If 1.0 disabled the feature, it wouldn't make much sense to allow factor up to
> 100.
True, we could set the upper limit to 2, but it doesn't matter much.
Note that this is different from autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor,
because inserted tuples are live, while dead tuples are not.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-03-17 21:34:26 | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-03-17 21:22:41 | Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page |