Re: njobs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: tibor(dot)foris(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: njobs
Date: 2017-12-06 22:25:53
Message-ID: 8af19cff-fa5d-0139-5449-d95b348827fc@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 12/6/17 09:40, tibor(dot)foris(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/app-pgdump.html
> Description:
>
> Explanation for njobs.
> &quot;Run the dump in parallel by dumping njobs tables simultaneously&quot;
>
> The word &quot;tables&quot; is misleading. Suggest removing it.

I think the word "tables" is essential for that sentence to be sensible.
Why do you think not?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

  • njobs at 2017-12-06 14:40:01 from tibor.foris

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message madhevan 2017-12-07 17:20:59 listen/notify sequence not working in windows10 pgAdmin 4
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-12-06 14:52:09 Re: Why the planner does not use index for a large amount of data?