Re: BUG #14107: Major query planner bug regarding subqueries and indices

From: Mathias Kunter <mathiaskunter(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14107: Major query planner bug regarding subqueries and indices
Date: 2016-04-22 05:49:40
Message-ID: 8a72e88e-819a-0d93-1d52-7b8134d7f86f@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

The problem unfortunately persists in 9.5.2 as well, where the query
plan is exactly the same as in 9.5.0. (Tested on Windows 7, but this
presumably is a cross-platform bug.) From what I can tell, this affects
all queries of the type

SELECT ... WHERE <condition> OR <indexed_column> IN (<subselect>);

As a workaround, you can use UNION, which works as expected:

SELECT ... WHERE <condition> UNION SELECT ... WHERE <indexed_column> IN
(<subselect>);

However, as it currently stands, queries of the above form are de facto
unusable with PostgreSQL. So this is pretty serious IMO.

Am 21.04.2016 um 23:01 schrieb David G. Johnston:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:56 AM, <mathiaskunter(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:mathiaskunter(at)gmail(dot)com>>wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 14107
> Logged by: Mathias Kunter
> Email address: mathiaskunter(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:mathiaskunter(at)gmail(dot)com>
> PostgreSQL version: 9.5.0
> Operating system: Windows 7
> Description:
>
> The query planner doesn't use an index although it could, causing an
> unneccessary sequential table scan. Step by step instructions to
> reproduce
> the problem are given below.
>
>
> Step 1 - just create a simple test table with an indexed id column:
>
> CREATE TABLE test (id serial NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT pkey PRIMARY KEY
> (id));
>
>
> Step 2 - note that the index is used for the following query as
> expected:
>
> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM test WHERE id = 1 OR id IN (2);
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bitmap Heap Scan on test (cost=8.33..13.67 rows=2 width=4)
> Recheck Cond: ((id = 1) OR (id = 2))
> -> BitmapOr (cost=8.33..8.33 rows=2 width=0)
> -> Bitmap Index Scan on pkey (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=1 width=0)
> Index Cond: (id = 1)
> -> Bitmap Index Scan on pkey (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=1 width=0)
> Index Cond: (id = 2)
>
>
> Step 3 - note that the index is NOT used for the following query:
>
> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM test WHERE id = 1 OR id IN (SELECT id FROM
> test WHERE
> id = 2);
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on test (cost=8.17..56.42 rows=1275 width=4)
> Filter: ((id = 1) OR (hashed SubPlan 1))
> SubPlan 1
> -> Index Only Scan using pkey on test test_1 (cost=0.16..8.17
> rows=1
> width=4)
> Index Cond: (id = 2)
>
>
> ​To lazy to research at the moment but I think this has been fixed and
> released. You show 9.5.0 as your version. Update and you should be fine.
>
> David J​.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message neeraj.chaurasia 2016-04-22 07:07:05 BUG #14108: \Copy Command does not takes varibales supplied using -v
Previous Message David Gould 2016-04-22 05:13:08 Re: BUG #14101: Postgres Service Crashes With Memory Error And Does Not Recover