| From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Li Jie <jay23jack(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Query Execution Project |
| Date: | 2010-09-28 11:17:10 |
| Message-ID: | 8FF636B2-6B35-48E9-9A5B-EF73AE395411@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/28/2010 07:24 AM, Li Jie wrote:
>> I'm interested in this parallel project,
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Parallel_Query_Execution
>>
>> But I can't find any discussion and current progress in the website, it
>> seems to stop for nearly a year?
>
> Yeah, I don't know of anybody really working on it ATM.
>
> If you are interested in a process based design, please have a look at
> the bgworker infrastructure stuff. It could be of help for a
> process-based implementation.
>
> Regards
>
> Markus Wanner
yes, i don't know of anybody either.
in addition to that it is more than a giant task. it means working on more than just one isolated part.
practically i cannot think of any stage of query execution which would not need some changes.
i don't see a feature like that within a realistic timeframe.
regards,
hans
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-09-28 11:46:00 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-09-28 10:18:13 | Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement |