On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:49 AM, Eyal Wilde wrote:
> 1. is there any more elegant solution?
Very possibly, but I'm having a heck of a time trying to figure out what your current code is actually doing.
What's the actual problem you're trying to solve here?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net