Re: getting our bearings on "out of memory. failed on request of size..."

From: Tom Darci <tom(at)nuws(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: getting our bearings on "out of memory. failed on request of size..."
Date: 2008-10-28 16:05:43
Message-ID: 8F56C9DE-49BE-4F95-9810-9F69D58B0326@nuws.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks Tom,

The "n" has always been small, like 20, or 4 or 32 (these numbers
are from memory, not written down), but the one we ran into today was
large: 67108864.

I will head to the EXPLAIN, as well as to getting the memory dump
from the log.

Regards,
-Tom

------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Darci
tom(at)nuws(dot)com

On Oct 28, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Tom Darci <tom(at)nuws(dot)com> writes:
>> Our PG server is serving up 50 databases or so (with identical
>> schemas), and the largest one of those has started giving us "out of
>> memory. failed on request of size n" errors in many places. This is a
>> 9 GB database with 100+ tables, the largest of which have 4 million
>> or
>> so rows. We see the Out of Memory errors when trying to run a "hard"
>> SQL statement (SELECTing from a complex view, updating all rows in a
>> large table, etc...)
>
> Well, it would be important to know if "n" is little or big, and to
> see
> the EXPLAIN output of the problem query. Also, an out-of-memory error
> will cause a memory usage map to be dumped to postmaster stderr ---
> that would be pretty useful to see too, if your logging setup captures
> it.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2008-10-28 16:06:55 PostgreSQL talk at CASCON
Previous Message Sam Mason 2008-10-28 15:48:21 Re: How to know the password for the user 'postgres'