| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: RE: xlog loose ends, continued |
| Date: | 2001-03-13 18:45:16 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D331C@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > It will be sufficient if DB will not use all 2^32 XIDs
> > without shutdown.
>
> I liked the xid wraparound idea, won't that be sufficient here too ?
> I don't like the idea to reuse a xid sooner than absolutely necessary.
We need it to reduce pg_log size requirements.
> This would complicate the search for potentially inconsistent pages
> after crash.
There is no such search currently and I can't imagine how/when/for what
to do such search.
?
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-13 18:53:42 | Re: xlog loose ends, continued |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-03-13 18:39:47 | RE: xlog loose ends, continued |