| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: AW: Proposed WAL changes |
| Date: | 2001-03-07 19:43:19 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D32F6@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > What I've thought is to implement a new command to
> > > change archdir under WAL's control.
> > > If it's different from Vadim's plan I don't object.
> >
> > Actually, I have no concrete plans for archdir yet - this
> > one is for WAL based BAR we should discuss in future.
> > So, I don't see why to remove archdir from pg_control now.
>
> Maybe we can get BAR in 7.1.X so maybe we should have the
> option to add it.
So, it's better to leave archdir in pg_control now - if we'll
decide that GUC is better place then we'll just ignore archdir
in pg_control. But if it will be better to have it in pg_control
then we'll not be able to add it there.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-03-07 20:01:40 | RE: Proposed WAL changes |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-03-07 18:44:24 | Re: Performance monitor |