RE: DeadLockCheck is buggy

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: DeadLockCheck is buggy
Date: 2001-01-17 17:25:49
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3288@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now,
> > and I doubt that this is the only bug lurking in it.
> > I think that we really ought to throw it away and start
> > over, because it doesn't look to me at all like a standard
> > deadlock-detection algorithm. The standard way of doing
>
> Go ahead. Throw away my code. *sniff* :-)

And my changes from the days of 6.5 -:)

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-01-17 17:58:54 Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-01-17 17:22:09 Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3