RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea
Date: 2001-01-16 21:22:26
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3286@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'll take care of fixing what I broke, but does anyone have
> suggestions for good names for the two concepts? The best I could
> come up with offhand is BEGIN/END_CRIT_SECTION

HOLD_INTERRUPTS
RESUME_INTERRUPTS

> and BEGIN/END_SUPER_CRIT_SECTION, but I'm not pleased with that...

BEGIN_CRIT_SECTION
END_CRIT_SECTION

- as it was -:)

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Miller 2001-01-16 21:36:29 Re: Re: INIT DB FAILURE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-16 21:21:31 Re: Re: INIT DB FAILURE