RE: backend corruption

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
Cc: George Johnson <gjohnson(at)jdsc(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: backend corruption
Date: 2001-01-08 17:19:30
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D322D@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I think that under 7.1, pg_log is not so critical anymore, but I'm not
> sure. Vadim, any comment?

Still critical till we implement UNDO and true changes rollback on
transaction abort.

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-08 17:20:42 Re: ECPG could not connect to the database.
Previous Message Jeff Eckermann 2001-01-08 17:17:07 RE: Help with SQL Function