RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Date: 2000-12-29 20:20:27
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3224@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Actually, one slocks are held
> > longer than anothers - probably we should use different delays...
>
> I don't understand the last remark. Are you proposing to mix some
> random numbers into the delays?

No, use different s_spincycle-s for different slocks.

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tgl 2000-12-29 20:39:07 pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in)
Previous Message Nathan Myers 2000-12-29 20:02:19 Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten