RE: COPY BINARY is broken...

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: COPY BINARY is broken...
Date: 2000-12-01 22:50:07
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31BF@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > I would rip it out.
>
> I thought about that too, but was afraid to suggest it ;-)
>
> How many people are actually using COPY BINARY?

It could be useful if only single scan would be required.
But I have no strong opinion about keeping it.

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-12-01 22:54:26 Re: COPY BINARY is broken...
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-12-01 22:47:48 RE: COPY BINARY is broken...