From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: regressplans failures |
Date: | 2000-11-23 00:58:53 |
Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31AD@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> I'm guessing this is a variant of the problem Philip
> >> Warner reported yesterday. Probably WAL-related. Vadim?
>
> > Probably, though I don't understand how WAL is related to
> > execution plans. Ok, it's easy to reproduce - I'll take a look.
>
> Could just be a question of a different pattern of table accesses?
> Let me know if you want help looking...
Fixed - fdstate was not properly setted in fd.c:fileNameOpenFile
with WAL enabled, sorry.
Philip, please try to reproduce crash.
Vadim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-11-23 00:59:26 | Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints |
Previous Message | jmscott | 2000-11-22 23:59:08 | Re: Table/Column Constraints |