RE: Something screwy about OID assignment with WAL code

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: Something screwy about OID assignment with WAL code
Date: 2000-11-20 23:14:49
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31A2@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Further investigation shows
>
> template1=# select min(oid),max(oid) from pg_aggregate;
> min | max
> ------+------
> 2503 | 2558
> (1 row)
>
> This is bogus. The pg_aggregate entries should have OIDs above
> 16384, not down in the reserved-OID range. It looks to me like
> initial startup of the OID counter is wrong with WAL enabled.

Thanks - I'll take a look.

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-21 00:20:07 Re: PG 7.1 pre-beta bug ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-20 22:43:59 Something screwy about OID assignment with WAL code