RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Date: 2000-10-17 00:28:36
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D56@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks.

Vadim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 5:40 PM
> To: Mikheev, Vadim
> Cc: 'Bruce Momjian'; pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer
> replacemen t policy
>
>
> "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> >> Sounds like a perfect idea. Good luck. :-)
>
> > Hmm, how much time will be required?
> > I integrate WAL right now and have to do significant changes
> > in bufmgr...
>
> Don't worry about it, I am not planning to commit that code anytime
> soon. (I have other stuff I want to fix in bufmgr, but I can wait
> for you to finish WAL first.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-17 00:36:26 The lightbulb just went on...
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-17 00:14:51 RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy