RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: "'Andrew Sullivan'" <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?
Date: 2000-09-26 23:05:49
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D17@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
>
> Nope. It has been broken a long time...

Ops. Ok...

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-09-27 00:06:37 Re: use of / in ~ vs. ~*
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-09-26 22:06:48 RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constrain t?