| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Chris Bitmead'" <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: postgres 7.2 features. |
| Date: | 2000-07-11 01:06:40 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C4D@SECTORBASE1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Is WAL planned for 7.1? What is the story with WAL?
Yes.
> I'm a bit concerned that the current storage manager is going to be
> thrown in the bit bucket without any thought for its benefits. There's
> some stuff I want to do with it like resurrecting time travel,
Why don't use triggers for time-travel?
Disadvantages of transaction-commit-time based time travel was pointed out
a days ago.
> some database replication stuff which can make use of the non-destructive
It was mentioned here that triggers could be used for async replication,
as well as WAL.
> storage method etc. There's a whole lot of interesting stuff that can be
> done with the current storage manager.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-11 01:16:00 | Re: Slashdot discussion |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-11 01:05:04 | Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |