RE: Big 7.1 open items

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-22 00:20:38
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C2C@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > relation version number
> >
> > I believe that we can avoid versions using WAL...
> >
>
> How to re-construct tables in place ?
> Is the following right ?
> 1) save the content of current table to somewhere
> 2) shrink the table and related indexes
> 3) reload the saved(+some filtering) content

Or - create tmp file and load with new content; log "intent to relink table
file";
relink table file; log "file is relinked".

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-22 00:43:20 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-22 00:16:30 RE: Big 7.1 open items