RE: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound)

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound)
Date: 2000-05-15 20:36:57
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018BDD@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I've read this paper ~2 years ago. My plans so far were:
> >
> > 1. WAL in 7.1
> > 2. New (overwriting) storage manager in 7.2
>
> Will we still have MVCC ?

I'm personally surely not one who would like to remove it -:)

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-05-15 20:39:41 RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-05-15 20:27:07 RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB