RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?
Date: 2000-05-09 17:22:06
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018BC3@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I think you have identified a problem that needs
> > a more general solution: we need to be robust in the case that
> > an index entry is on disk that points to a tuple that never made
> > it to disk.

And this general solution is WAL.

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-09 17:26:27 Re: MD5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-09 17:20:07 Re: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?