Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN
Date: 2011-05-18 17:29:06
Message-ID: 8F09289E-7CD9-49A2-B73F-08B44F2578AC@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 18, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> I think building tools so that PGXN distributions are automatically harvested and turned into StackBuilder/RPM/.deb binaries would be the place to start on that.
>
> Hmmm ... I think the real point of those policies about "no source
> builds" is to ensure that their systems are only running code that's
> been vetted to some degree by a responsible person (ie, an authorized
> packager for whatever distro they run). So any sort of automated
> collection of packages would go directly against what the policies are
> trying to accomplish, and would likely lead to the policies being
> amended to specifically ban use of your repo :-(

Well, it's up to the maintainers of those repos whether they want use such a feed. Magnus and Devrim seemed interested in it on Twitter last week; Magnus, in fact, originally suggested it.

https://twitter.com/magnushagander/status/65431239770898434

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-05-18 17:47:52 Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-18 17:23:45 Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN