Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-22 20:33:19
Message-ID: 8EB2E25B-58CF-477C-9439-2769B2EB6B56@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 22, 2008, at 12:51, Simon Riggs wrote:

> I think we should return them with comments that if you integrate them
> more with core *and* can justify having done so, then we might include
> those features later

I believe I've done both these things for citext, though if there is
more to be done, I'm glad to do it.

New patch coming later today, BTW.

Thanks,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-22 20:49:35 Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-22 19:51:45 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?