Re: Valgrind failures in Apply Launcher's bgworker_quickdie() exit

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Valgrind failures in Apply Launcher's bgworker_quickdie() exit
Date: 2018-12-14 02:15:19
Message-ID: 8EA259F8-4F51-44AB-A827-101682B86E57@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On December 13, 2018 6:01:04 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Since libcrypto.so is implicated, Andres asked me off-list if my
>> changes to random number state initialisation might be linked to
>> skink's failures beginning 12 or 15 days ago. It appears not, as it
>> was green for several runs after that commit.
>> ...
>> It's Debian unstable, which could be a factor. Bugs in glibc?

Note it's only failing on master...

>Has anyone tried to reproduce this on other platforms?

I recently also hit this locally, but since that's also Debian unstable... Note that removing openssl "fixed" the issue for me.

>It'd be interesting to know which updates were applied to skink's
>host before the first failing run.

I'll check the logs when I'm back at a real computer.

Andres

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-12-14 02:52:03 Re: slight tweaks to documentation about runtime pruning
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-14 02:01:04 Re: Valgrind failures in Apply Launcher's bgworker_quickdie() exit