From: | Zheng Yang <zhengyang4k(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Shiv <rama(dot)theone(at)gmail(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-students <pgsql-students(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: foreign data wrappers |
Date: | 2011-03-29 11:28:57 |
Message-ID: | 8DB4D3E9-DA21-45FD-A2A2-5C6D479AA565@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-students |
Hi guys,
>>
>> I've briefly gone through the slides. Regarding the 6 callbacks, is that correct to say that a full table scan will always be performed irregardless of the sql statement,
>> the FDW is blind to the sql query performed, right?
>
> Yes, fairly much. If the feed is large you need some way to pass a limit to the foreign side, possibly via table options. I'm fairly sure you won't be able to get it via the SELECT statement.
>
Regarding the previous flickr example, I'm wondering how this 'free text search' function can be done if the FDW is blind to the SELECT statement.
For instance, the following query is to retrieve a photo relevant to 'panda':
SELECT photo FROM flickr_table WHERE search LIKE '%panda%';
In this case, the FDW can only open a connection to flickr web service and return the next 'row' .
The problem is that there are a huge number of photos in flickr server and retrieving them sequentially is not realistic.
Any ideas on how this can be done?
ZY
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tushar nehete | 2011-03-29 11:35:04 | Re: Autocommit off - commits/rollbacks |
Previous Message | Jerry Sievers | 2011-03-29 07:24:06 | Re: Autocommit off - commits/rollbacks |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-03-29 15:48:53 | Re: foreign data wrappers |
Previous Message | Zheng Yang | 2011-03-28 09:49:59 | Re: foreign data wrappers |