64 bit Win 2008, 32 bit client, ?bit Postgres?

From: Russell Keane <Russell(dot)Keane(at)inps(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: 64 bit Win 2008, 32 bit client, ?bit Postgres?
Date: 2013-02-07 15:25:28
Message-ID: 8D0E5D045E36124A8F1DDDB463D548557D0EF8A621@mxsvr1.is.inps.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I appreciate this may have been answered before but I can find no definitive answer so please bear with me...

I found a good explanation here but it's a bit out of date:
http://blog.hagander.net/archives/73-PostgreSQL-vs-64-bit-windows.html

We have a 64 bit Win 2008 machine with 16 GB RAM
Our 32 bit client applications are on 32 bit windows.
We have developed and tested against 32 bit postgres.

Would it be better to upgrade postgres to (or start out with) 64 bit?

As I understand it, under windows you're better off leaving the memory for the OS as postgres relies heavily on OS level caching and, as postgres is multi-process, in theory each process (and therefore connection) could address up to 4 GB anyway.

Also, I understand that 64 bit can handle larger numbers (and possibly move dates around more efficiently) but are there any fundamental differences between the functionality or behaviour in 32 / 64 postgres for windows?

Thanks for your help,

Regards,

Regards,

Russell Keane
INPS

Tel: +44 (0)20 7501 7277
[cid:image001(dot)jpg(at)01CE0546(dot)44E37510]
Follow us<https://twitter.com/INPSnews> on twitter | visit www.inps.co.uk<http://www.inps.co.uk/>

________________________________
Registered name: In Practice Systems Ltd.
Registered address: The Bread Factory, 1a Broughton Street, London, SW8 3QJ
Registered Number: 1788577
Registered in England
Visit our Internet Web site at www.inps.co.uk
The information in this internet email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is not authorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of INPS or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact is(dot)helpdesk(at)inps(dot)co(dot)uk

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2013-02-07 15:27:28 Re: ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: ""
Previous Message Ken Benson 2013-02-07 15:24:14 Re: Re: [NOVICE] Problems with ñ and tildes / CSV import problems in PostgreSQL 9.1