From: | Jeffrey Melloy <jmelloy(at)visualdistortion(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.3 PDF documentation |
Date: | 2003-04-20 15:19:59 |
Message-ID: | 8CC0E062-7343-11D7-9620-000393C78AC0@visualdistortion.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for your help.
Jeff
On Saturday, April 19, 2003, at 02:54 PM, Robert Treat wrote:
> The files I put up are pdf files, and are available now. Note if you
> look in
> the docs, there is a section called "Building the Documentation" that
> explains different ways you can build the docs. Questions about that
> should
> be sent to the -docs mailing list.
>
> As for 7.3.3, I'd suspect a release within the next month, but that's
> pure
> speculation. A few more people testing 7.3.3 from CVS would probably
> help
> speed up the processes. As far as docs are concerned though, I believe
> the
> standing policy is that most doc fixes don't get backpatched for minor
> releases, so I wouldn't expect anything different for docs even once
> 7.3.3 is
> released.
>
> Robert Treat
>
> On Friday 18 April 2003 06:11 pm, Network Administrator wrote:
>> Ahh, ok I was just about to email Jeffery and tell him I didn't have
>> the
>> stuff to compile the sgml files. When can we grab the PS version?
>> Better
>> yet, when 7.3.3 going to be out :)
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-20 15:21:32 | Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used |
Previous Message | Ken Williams | 2003-04-20 14:29:55 | Re: does parser still parse those comment out lines? |