| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com |
| Cc: | nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com,Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>,Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,keisuke kuroda <keisuke(dot)kuroda(dot)3862(at)gmail(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11 |
| Date: | 2020-02-13 16:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | 8CB3B0A2-8039-4306-AB10-4BAFBFDB2779@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On February 13, 2020 8:30:45 AM PST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Cool. Emre, any chance you could write a patch along those lines?
>
>> How about the one attached?
>
>I see some minor things I don't like here, eg float_*flow_error()
>need some documentation as to why they exist. But I'll review,
>fix those things up and then push.
Would be good to mark them noreturn too.
Wonder if it's useful to add the"cold" marker to pg. Not as part of this patch, but for functions like these.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-02-13 16:47:59 | Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROM and DELETE USING |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-13 16:30:45 | Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11 |