Re: [BUG] false positive in bt_index_check in case of short 4B varlena datum

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Zhilin <m(dot)zhilin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [BUG] false positive in bt_index_check in case of short 4B varlena datum
Date: 2024-01-19 18:16:34
Message-ID: 8C83FCCA-2548-499A-8B1C-96C3D8ADB787@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> On 9 Jan 2024, at 22:59, Michael Zhilin <m(dot)zhilin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> Here is rebased version (v2) of patch supposed to make CF bot happy.

I've marked CF item as ready for committer.

> On 1/8/24 17:34, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>> Hi Alexander!
>>
>> I think both cases are very interesting and deserve two separate bug items.

Alexander, do you plan to provide fixes for bugs you discovered?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-01-20 04:00:00 Re: [BUG] false positive in bt_index_check in case of short 4B varlena datum
Previous Message vignesh C 2024-01-19 16:40:06 Re: Excessive number of replication slots for 12->14 logical replication