Re: Proposal for change in pgsql-announce behavior

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for change in pgsql-announce behavior
Date: 2006-11-15 15:46:59
Message-ID: 8C56AB8C-781A-43A2-8E6C-A3C87E4A7F6F@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Oct 29, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> If you can't use one list to unsubscribe another, then you can
> reverse it; have them reply to pgsql-announce, but have a seperate
> address (pgsql-announce-submit) for submitting new announcements.

Another benefit to that is it would probably cut down on the amount
of spam flowing in...
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-11-15 16:15:50 Re: Not receiving ml posts
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-11-15 15:46:36 Re: -announce list administration