Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
Date: 2011-11-12 22:09:18
Message-ID: 8BF96ADC-1681-41C8-847B-182C0632DF55@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov11, 2011, at 19:17 , Tom Lane wrote:
> But frankly I do not like any of these proposals. Making fundamental
> changes in long-established semantics in the name of squeezing out a few
> cycles is the wrong way to design software.

Hm, then maybe this is one of the things to put onto the next protocol
version todo list?

best regards,
Florian Pflug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Redekop 2011-11-12 23:43:51 Re: 9.1.2 ?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-11-12 22:02:23 Re: Allow substitute allocators for PGresult.