Re: FW: OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream() in 7.4driver + 7.4 database

See attached.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Cramer [mailto:pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Alexey Yudichev
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: [JDBC] OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream() in 7.4driver + 7.4 database

Alexey,

Can you put together a test case and I'll try to fix it?

Dave
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 04:40, Alexey Yudichev wrote:
> Can I have any comments on this?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Yudichev
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [JDBC] OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream() in 7.4 driver
> + 7.4 database
>
>
> I have noticed that I can use only latest 7.4 driver with 7.4 database. I tried both driver from jdbc.postgresql.org (7.4 beta3) and from CVS (:pserver:anoncvs(at)anoncvs(dot)postgresql(dot)org:/projects/cvsroot) and discovered that with compatible=7.1 flag invoking rs.getBinaryStream() or rs.getBytes() on an OID column blocks forever (somewhere in java.net.SocketInputStream so I guess it's a server that is not responding). According to 7.4 documentation http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/jdbc-binary-data.html, this should work. getBLOB() works great, but JBoss 3.2 server which I am using is only capable of dealing with large objects via getBinaryStream()/setBinaryStream().
>
> Combination "OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream()" worked well in PostgreSQL 7.2 with latest 7.3 driver.
>
> What options do I have? I could migrate to bytea although I don't liked the performance of it. But before I do that I want to make sure that this issue is a bug that is about to be fixed or something different.
> Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>