| From: | "Gregory Williamson" <Gregory(dot)Williamson(at)digitalglobe(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Thom Brown" <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cannot restart postgresql when increasing max_connections |
| Date: | 2009-01-08 20:07:14 |
| Message-ID: | 8B319E5A30FF4A48BE7EEAAF609DB233021F3968@COMAIL01.digitalglobe.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake spaketh:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 12:51 -0700, Gregory Williamson wrote:
> > Thom Brown wrote:
> > <...>
> > > I actually mentioned pgPool II to my boss earlier, and it's
> > something we
> > > will have to seriously consider, but will have to do some research
> > first.
<...>
> > Using pgPool means we have a max limit of 100 and have almost never
> > gone near it -- usually we have 12-25 connections at once and load and
> > throughput are higher than they were before.
>
> Not to disparage pgPool, but we have also had great results with
> pgBouncer.
I should have mentioned we quit while we ahead and never tried pgBouncer,
which may be a better solution. (didn't meant to cast any mud!)
And I realized belatedly that we use pgPool, a much simpler beast. We have
looked at pgPool II but haven't implemented it.
G
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrus | 2009-01-08 20:10:34 | Re: column "id" is of type integer but expression is of type character |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-01-08 20:06:25 | Re: Cannot restart postgresql when increasing max_connections |