Re: casting BOOL to somthng

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: sad <sad(at)bankir(dot)ru>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: casting BOOL to somthng
Date: 2004-09-01 06:38:32
Message-ID: 8AF2CE57-FBE1-11D8-A2A0-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


On Sep 1, 2004, at 2:41 PM, sad wrote:

> On Wednesday 01 September 2004 09:24, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>>
>> There's a fairly accepted convention for integer representations.
>> There's no such convention for boolean representations.
>
> then why do you print its value on a screen ?!

Perhaps because if you don't print *something* you can't see it?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sad 2004-09-01 06:43:06 casting UNKNOWN to REGCLASS
Previous Message sad 2004-09-01 06:27:11 Re: casting BOOL to somthng