Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile
Date: 2019-02-18 15:42:33
Message-ID: 89E5F1DB-5090-4F04-9C76-F320FC928920@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On February 18, 2019 7:39:25 AM PST, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>I propose to add an equivalent to unconstify() for volatile. When
>working on this, I picked the name unvolatize() mostly as a joke, but
>it
>appears it's a real word. Other ideas?

Shouldn't we just remove just about all those use of volatile? Basically the only valid use these days is on sigsetjmp call sites.

Andres

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-02-18 15:43:50 Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-02-18 15:39:25 unconstify equivalent for volatile