| From: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSDD reliability |
| Date: | 2011-05-04 19:02:17 |
| Message-ID: | 89C26BB4-B1A2-437C-855A-C3A24D3D9CEF@elevated-dev.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On May 4, 2011, at 11:31 AM, David Boreham wrote:
> To be honest, like the article author, I'd be happy with 300+ days to failure, IF the drives provide an accurate predictor of impending doom.
No problem with that, for a first step. ***BUT*** the failures in this article and many others I've read about are not in high-write db workloads, so they're not write wear, they're just crappy electronics failing.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | durumdara | 2011-05-04 19:17:29 | ZEOS or PGDAC - How to lock a resource? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2011-05-04 18:02:25 | Re: auto-reconnect: temp schemas, sequences, transactions |