| From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tablespace setup issue |
| Date: | 2019-11-21 15:11:43 |
| Message-ID: | 8997b55f-d9d1-9d38-fbc0-3bb335e0dc8a@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/21/19 8:59 AM, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 08:54 -0600, Ron wrote:
>>> Don't create tablespaces.
>>> Stick with the default tablespace.
>> Why?
> Because you won't need them.
>
> Tablespaces have a limited number of use cases:
> - Distribute I/O across several devices (you can do the same
> on a lower level using striping).
> - Put some tables or indexes faster and some on slower storage.
> - Provide a size limit for a table or a database.
> - Have your temporary files on a different file system.
>
> In a virtualized environment, you never want tablespaces.
After adding another 350GB to the data/base filesystem, the storage team
said that the virtual LUN on our ESX host is full. No more expansion of
this database until and unless they create a new LUN (on storage replicated
to a different DC using SRM).
Thus, to enlarge the database on this VM, we either...
1. create a tablespace on a different (modest sized) LUN, or
2. create a completely new 10TB LUN and migrate the whole db (including
backups) to that new LUN.
Honestly, using a new tablespace seems simpler.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason L. Amerson | 2019-11-21 15:15:33 | RE: Remote Connection Help |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2019-11-21 14:59:36 | Re: Tablespace setup issue |