From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What about Perl autodie? |
Date: | 2024-02-08 06:03:23 |
Message-ID: | 898467.1707372203@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:52 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> No drawbacks. I've been using it heavily for many, many years. Came out in 5.10.1,
>> which should be available everywhere at this point (2009 was the year of release)
> We moved our minimum to 5.14 fairly recently, so we're good on that point.
Yeah, but only recently. I'm a little worried about the value of this
change relative to the amount of code churn involved, and more to the
point I worry about the risk of future back-patches injecting bad code
into back branches that don't use autodie.
(Back-patching the use of autodie doesn't seem feasible, since before
v16 we supported perl 5.8.something.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-02-08 06:04:47 | Re: Fix propagation of persistence to sequences in ALTER TABLE / ADD COLUMN |
Previous Message | Sutou Kouhei | 2024-02-08 06:03:08 | Re: meson: catalog/syscache_ids.h isn't installed |