| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure. |
| Date: | 2024-07-22 16:46:01 |
| Message-ID: | 896429.1721666761@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Looking at dodo's failures, it seems that while it passes
> module-xid_wraparound-check, all failures happened only during
> testmodules-install-check-C. Can we check the server logs written
> during xid_wraparound test in testmodules-install-check-C?
Oooh, that is indeed an interesting observation. There are enough
examples now that it's hard to dismiss it as chance, but why would
the two runs be different?
(I agree with the comment that we shouldn't be running this test
twice, but that's a separate matter.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-07-22 16:47:45 | Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-07-22 16:34:42 | Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates |