| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Muhammad Malik <muhammad(dot)malik1(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regarding t_cid in Neon heap WAL records |
| Date: | 2024-07-24 19:27:14 |
| Message-ID: | 89613c43-31c9-49ab-970d-56f9e59d87ec@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24/07/2024 21:44, Muhammad Malik wrote:
> Neon added a t_cid field to heap WAL records
> https://github.com/yibit/neon-postgresql/blob/main/docs/core_changes.md#add-t_cid-to-heap-wal-records <https://github.com/yibit/neon-postgresql/blob/main/docs/core_changes.md#add-t_cid-to-heap-wal-records>.
This isn't really a pgsql-hackers topic, so I've opened an issue on the
neon github issue tracker for this:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8499. (Thanks for the report
though!)
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Schneider | 2024-07-24 19:43:44 | Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-07-24 19:27:02 | Re: Incremental backup from a streaming replication standby fails |