| From: | "lists(at)mgreg(dot)com" <lists(at)mgreg(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 15:49:25 |
| Message-ID: | 8942FD2B-CB15-48EA-BA37-2470387C922B@mgreg.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>
> The answer is still "no". :-)
>
> The usual thing it to connect to the "postgres" database (or to
> "template1" in older versions of PG), and then you can issue queries
> to
> see what's there. You're pretty much guaranteed that one of those
> databases will exist (they're created by initdb), unless whoever
> installed the server did something strange.
>
> Ray.
Hrm...Ok, well, for the record, I'm moving some systems from MySQL to
Postgres and am in the process of getting familiar with it. I was
hoping there were some higher level management items like "show
databases", and "show tables", etc in Postgres as well. I also didn't
want to depend on there being a table there that I needed to "get in
the door" with, so to speak. I'm guessing no one in the community
sees this addition as desirable (or feasible)?
Thanks for the replies,
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-11 15:56:07 | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |
| Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2009-04-11 15:39:55 | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |