From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, cturner(at)redhat(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: perl problems in RC1 |
Date: | 2002-01-23 22:02:46 |
Message-ID: | 8931.1011823366@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> If the installed perl is built with threads support, plperl won't
> build. Here is a fix for dealing properly with this, by Chip Turner
> (cturner(at)redhat(dot)com)
Uh ... how long has pTHX been a standard part of the Perl API?
In other words, how many configurations will this patch break?
(Right offhand I see no pTHX or pTHX_ in my trusty old 5.00503 perl,
for example.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Studenmund | 2002-01-23 22:20:22 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-01-23 21:57:08 | Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers |