| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function |
| Date: | 2020-09-30 19:11:06 |
| Message-ID: | 893081.1601493066@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:50:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, I was just finishing up back-patching the patch I posted
>> yesterday. I think we should just fix it, not document that it's
>> broken.
> Agreed, that's what I wanted. You stated in a later email you couldn't
> convince yourself of the backpatch, which is why I asked.
Oh, I see where our wires are crossed. I meant that I couldn't
convince myself to back-patch the make_timestamp() change.
(I'm still willing to listen to an argument to do so, if anyone
wants to make one --- but that part feels more like a feature
addition than a bug fix.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-09-30 20:20:16 | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-09-30 19:05:34 | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-30 19:47:26 | Re: __pg_log_level in anonynous enum should be initialized? (Was: pgsql: Change SHA2 implementation based on OpenSSL to use EVP digest ro) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-09-30 19:05:34 | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function |