| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Garfield Lewis <garfield(dot)lewis(at)lzlabs(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: [EXT] Re: Can we get the CTID value | 
| Date: | 2022-01-20 18:11:04 | 
| Message-ID: | 892316.1642702264@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Garfield Lewis <garfield(dot)lewis(at)lzlabs(dot)com> writes:
> I think you are right in the case of INPUT/RECEIVE, however we should be able to get that info during OUTPUT/SEND (I think) since it is fixed at that point. At the time I return the information to the user I could augment the output to add that information to the output. However, I still don't know if it is even possible to get that information in those functions. Is that at all possible?
No, it's the same problem in reverse: the output function cannot
know where the value came from.  There is no hard and fast
reason that it must have come out of a table, either.  Consider
something as simple as
SELECT 'blah blah'::yourtype;
This'll invoke the type's input function to parse the literal string,
and later it'll invoke the output function to reconstruct a string
to send to the client, and there's no table involved.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Garfield Lewis | 2022-01-20 18:36:08 | Re: [EXT] Re: Can we get the CTID value | 
| Previous Message | Garfield Lewis | 2022-01-20 18:00:53 | Re: [EXT] Re: Can we get the CTID value |