Re: Bison 3.0 updates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Date: 2014-05-28 18:43:52
Message-ID: 8922.1401302632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> What they want is that you use
> %name-prefix "base_yy"
> instead of
> %name-prefix="base_yy"
> That makes the warning go away.

Oh really!?

> The %something=something syntax is not documented anywhere, so it looks
> like it worked more or less by accident. We don't use it anywhere else
> either (e.g. %expect 0, not %expect=0).

Hah. That's probably my fault, somewhere way back when. I'll fix it,
unless you're already on it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-28 18:51:04 Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-28 18:34:18 Re: Bison 3.0 updates

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-28 18:51:04 Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-28 18:34:18 Re: Bison 3.0 updates